Monday, October 12, 2009

Another great Totara has fallen


A knight, a coveted son of the Te Arawa people and a giant in the entertainment world of this nation; we have lost yet another great in Sir Howard Morrison. Looking back on some of the clips that were shown on the news and memorials plastered on the internet of his gigs and several performances, I see now the vindication in the words of my dear old gran “the old people are all gone”! To an extent she is correct, but there are some that are still around. We allude to a maxim that indulges in sarcasm: “it’s like finding a needle in a haystack”. “The old people” is an implication of the 1940s – 1960s era who lived and generated their daily activities and lives based on their circumstances, circumstances that entailed hard labour, little earnings and a good strawberry jam on bread with cream. This generation existed around the 1950’s in the shearing sheds of rural New Zealand and brandished tales of old that wound even the driest of humour into hysterics. Sir Howard was lucky enough to be a part of this generation, but on a greater spectrum of the hardcase life, was exposed to stardom. In an interview with Neil Collins, a veteran Dunedin broadcaster which occurred to be the long-time entertainer’s last interview, Sir Howard alluded to the language adopted by him and the quartet in years past: e.g. ‘how are you’ would be ‘would you be doy’. “Tenses were swapped and consonants were switched” NZPA Mobile Web. After being asked how his health was, Sir Howard countered “I can’t sprint down the street in my underpants in Dunedin anymore”. Collins: “There was a lot of hi jinx in old days between shows. It was good, clean fun”. I guess you can fathom that not only did Sir Howard maintain his vocal prowess; he also had his wits about him. This is what a dear old gran alludes to: “the days of old have been carried through the people of old, now they are just old memories”. Collins made a range of inquiries in the interview in which he described as simply two old chums catching up. After reading the article, I have come to realise how great Sir Howard Morrison really was and indeed still is. After the feats he endeavoured with raising awareness for an anti-drug and alcohol programme on his 45 day “ride for life” horse trek throughout NZ, his work for Maori and Polynesian health, and of course his hefty contributions to entertainment, you realise the greatness of such an icon. From a Maori perspective, there is an analogy between the death of a figure of status and a great tree (Totara tree) in the realm of Tane-Mahuta falling. It implies both the importance of the status of the individual and also his/her impact on society.
Maoridom has witnessed over the years a number of “Totara” pass through the decades, all of which predominantly actively existed through the kdkla cohort generation; ranging from politicians, to activists, and even sports stars. Sir Howard in his own right is in a league of the likes of George Nepia, Sir Edmund Hillary and indeed the Maori Queen Te Arikinui Dame Te Atairangikaahu.
I thought this quote accurately and pleasingly summed up the character of Sir Howard Morrison by his nephew and acclaimed actor Temuera Morrison: “he held a kind of awe for us, there was this mystique about him, but to us he was a father figure guiding us to stand on our own feet and hold our own. He was very charismatic, performing everywhere. He had a remarkable following and the special gift of feeling an audience as he worked his way to his crescendo”. This is a great loss for NZ as Collins rightly stated “he was the Edmund Hillary of entertainment”.
Ka hinga te totara nui a Taane, e Ta Howard, moe mai.


Check out some tributes to Sir Howard


Homai Te Pakipaki… The grassroots of NZ Idol


OK so this is my last post for this class, and I thought to myself why not go out on a high note for the Maoris. I’m sure you the readers have had enough of my Maori spiels but have you checked out the talent lately? There are some singers out there with the potential to go far in the music industry. Although the season ended with a bang, Maori Television’s Homai Te Pakipaki is always a great loss once the final is over. It’s Maori TV’s most highly rated programme, and it is no wonder too: it calls on and scouts out all New Zealanders to come forward and sing their hearts out on national telly. It’s the “grassroots” version of NZ Idol and all those other crap idol shows bombarding our screens. The rules and regulations for contestants are fairly liberal and aren’t as intense and restrictive as the ‘idol’ shows. The point of difference here is that pretty much all the people who audition are great singers, who come from all backgrounds, of all ages, without being under pressure to look good like the idol shows. Fresh NZ talent at its best.
This season was jam-packed with scores of talented singers from a spectrum of ethnicities. This year the winner was a Fijian, Kelston Boys High School student who is here in New Zealand on a rugby scholarship. He wooed the crowd with his rendition of soul singer, Billy Paul’s soul hit, Me and Mrs Jones. Second place getter was Dane Moeke from Gisborne who blew the audience with Fantasia Barrino’s idol hit debut song, When You Believe. Finally, Susan Tipuna of Wairoa sang her way to third place with an overwhelming performance of Al Green’s, Let’s Stay Together. Contestants on this show come to the stage with no musical experience and turn out to be talented singers. If only this programme was taken more seriously, these potential artists would go a long way.

Check out the performances here, some of the talent is mean!!!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiUZbvVvSCM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nryUsNEbu_8




Susan Tipuna comes from a musical family and has travelled to various countries as a professional artist. Check out her performance here, it’s mean as!

http://www.maoritelevision.com/default.aspx?tabid=273&pid=211&epid=5226

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Maori TV’s controversial free-to-air rights bid

I came across a comprehensive blog http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/blogs/on-the-house/2935580/MTS-rugby-bid-a-poser-for-National, which outlined problems and possible resolutions, about the free-to-air rights dilemma for the 2011 Rugby World Cup: here’s the story in full perspective.
1) TVNZ, TV3 and Maori Television have all put in a bid for free-to-air broadcasting rights of 16 rugby matches of the 2011 Rugby World Cup, including All Black pool matches, the semi-final and the final.
2) Sky TV has won TV rights to produce coverage of all 48 matches.
3) Maori TV’s bid was reportedly greater than the bids made by TV3 and TVNZ. Te Puni Kokiri authorised $3 million, from its Maori Development scheme, to be used.
4) TV3 and TVNZ broadcast to ALL New Zealanders through the UHF signal whereas Maori Television only provides coverage to 85% of New Zealanders.
5) Te Puni Kokiri and Prime Minister, John Key, believes that the bid is “ministry money that would be put to good use”.
6) Maori TV could avoid the dilemma of not broadcasting to the 15% or so New Zealanders, who lie beyond the boundaries of UHF signals, by sub-contracting its rights to another provider. TVNZ or TV3 for example. This decision, if successful, lies with the International Rugby Board (IRB).
Maori TV is looking like the front runner despite the problems it faces. At the end of the day their bid was higher. I’m not saying it’s the fairest, but it certainly looks to be the strongest.
The media have slammed MTS’s bid by saying that $3 million of “taxpayers’ money”, I repeat “taxpayers money”, which effectively is available to “foster Maori Development”, is being used to bid for the rights. What about taxpayer money that is used to supply ‘perks’ and benefits for Ministers of Cabinet? TVNZ can’t afford to criticise the issue, after they used charter funding to bid for the Olympic Games, which it clearly was not permitted to do.
The Prime Minister will certainly be analysing the situation with much thought, as will the National loyalists who voted him into power.
MTS insists that 10% of commentary be broadcast in Te Reo; what a clever move by Minister of Maori Affairs, Pita Sharples: who justifies that the bid will contribute to Maori development. I agree with the blogger of MTS rugby bid a poser for National: that people who do not have Sky and object to being forced to treat an All Blacks rugby game as some sort of “educational experience”. It’s inappropriate to provide a learning experience with rugby world cup coverage. How would we feel if the French language was enforced into rugby commentary here in New Zealand, for the purpose of increased ‘French’ language development?
What John Keys could do is prop up MTS’ annual budget, of $28 million, to allow Maori TV to buy some more transmitters to broadcast to the 15% of New Zealanders who will miss out. Of course National won’t do such a thing as it will most definitely affect their position in power from those opposing. Whatever the outcome, I applaud Maori TV for being game enough to promote their service and for being a “silent competitor” in the Television broadcasting industry.
Here is an article that refers to elite persons to provide substance to the story.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/2938366/South-could-miss-cup-on-Maori-TV


Check out an interview between Pita Sharples and Paul Henry over the issue. Is this a mis-use of taxpayer money?
http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/sharples-defends-maori-tv-bid-3048758/video

Humble man, humble victory…for David Tua



25 bouts, two losses vs. a staggering 50 professional bouts (43 knockouts), three losses and a draw; you do the math! Take your pick, but the fight dubbed the “fight of the century” is undoubtedly a knock back for Shane Cameron after he was smashed, seven seconds into the second round, by a slimmer David Tua (36) in Hamilton on Saturday night. The propelling form of the “Tuamanator” proved costly for Cameron, who is of Ngati Rongomaiwahine descent, after he was taken to hospital for checkups after being knocked out three times in quick succession. In the end Tua’s dynamite left hook blew Cameron to the canvas leaving him dumped and vulnerable.
The bandwagon had been tipped to one side from the very beginning, well at least after Cameron’s little backlash: karma made an unsurprising U-turn and smashed Cameron in the backside. A wise man once said “even as I have seen, they that plow iniquity, and sow wickedness, reap the same” Bible: Job 8:4, Cameron haunted by his remarks about Tua: “a fat old man who was past his best”. The fight was fortunately inevitable for Tua who reaped his rewards: not only shedding a few kilos but also keeping humble about the fight: not intentionally setting out to badmouth Cameron or his team. After the fight, Tua even extended public awareness of his humility and self-composed nature by saying “I’d like to thank Shane for giving me the opportunity to do what I like doing tonight”.
On top of that, Tua had on his side the experience and the power. Cameron has only fought a mere 25 fights which are heavily outweighed by Tua’s 54. Not only that, Tua is in a whole different class to that of Cameron, one which boasts a heavyweight title class on a thin-layer of ice at the pinnacle of professional boxing. However, applause must be given to Cameron – who has ceded his WBO Oriental and Asian-Pacific belts to Tua – for his courage. We must not deter ourselves from backing Shane Cameron for his game is bound to be tested in upcoming fights in the future, but, this is David Tua’s moment to shine. God knows he is a likely contender for world heavyweight boxing championships in the years to come. Tua’s objective now should be to remain focused and continue to show his humane respectable character. As another wise man also once said: “If the good is sown, the good is collected. When positive things are made, that returns well”: Yannick Noah.

Here are some follow-ups on the fight
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/2928917/Cameron-has-no-regrets
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/2928717/Tua-knocks-out-Cameron

Here is an opinion column on Tua’s amazing comeback
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/opinion/2929101/A-career-reborn-but-is-it-too-late




Catch the action here!


Wat’s in a whuckin name?


And so it continues. Our nation, forever consumed by the flames of social segregation, influenced to some extent on the foundations of indigenous tikanga, continues to rage warfare on a political minefield. The issue at hand... The letter H in the spelling of Wanganui, ahem... I beg your pardon, Whanganui. The finding rests accordingly with the National Geographic Board’s (GB) decision to drop the ‘h’ back into Wanganui after a submission made to them by local iwi, Tupoho. The struggle has persisted over a number of years and local Maori have made a number of submissions to the GB over the issue. Effectively, “Wanganui” is not a Maori word, in which controversial mayor, Michael Laws, openly admits knowledge to but he believes that the word has, quote: “a culture, heritage and mana all of its own” http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/opinion/willie-jackson/2309416/It-s-Whanganui-not-Wanganui. Mr Laws called on the Government to respect a May referendum of the city’s residents, which overwhelmingly rejected a change. 77% showed their support of leaving Wanganui h-less. On the flip side, Te Runanga o Tupoho iwi spokesman Ken Mair said it was a clear-cut issue that involved “correcting a wrong”. He said “if you spell someone’s name wrong, you must do the right thing and change it”. The iwi said that without the ‘h’ the name ‘Wanganui’ is without substance because Whanganui means/translates as ‘great harbour’ or great expanse of water. It was named thus by an ancestor of the concerned area, Hau [ancestor], of the Aotea waka. “Whanga” – harbour, “nui” – great.
So Michael Laws is all up in arms about the issue, calling the GB’s decision a racist one, because it didn’t consider the opinions of the constituents of Whanganui. Well, clearly in the matter of speaking, the issue has gone beyond the ratepayers and citizens of Whanganui. The word “Whanganui” is a Maori word, so the matter SHOULD rest with the local iwi of the area, shouldn’t it? And, how can Laws justify ‘Wanganui’ as having its own “mana”? Is it not unethical to apply the word “mana” to a non-Maori word in the context of validating it [the non-Maori word]? Tupoho have been struggling with the issue for over a decade so it’s no surprise to myself and many other Maori that the GB has had a change of heart. It’s, as Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia says, “the right thing to do”. After all, the city derives its name from the river, “Whanganui”.
Over time, the modern usage of the Wanganui dialect has forced, in some elusive manner or another, people to spell the name the same as the sound of the name. With this idea in place, why should ‘Whanganui’ be spelt ‘wh’? Assuming the principles of the alphabet of the Western World (A B C D and so on), who says we can’t or shouldn’t spell Whanganui with an ‘f’? People must remember that the Maori language is not a written one, so who knows what the correct spelling is. Whatever the spelling, it won’t impact the way the Taranaki dialect pronounces ‘Whanganui’. It will forever be called ‘Wanganui’ by the people from there.
http://tvnz.co.nz/breakfast-news/wanganui-whanganui-5-33-2997461
The underlying issue of this matter was laid out on key by Willie Jackson in his blog http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/opinion/willie-jackson/2309416/It-s-Whanganui-not-Wanganui; that: “Maori are getting too big for their boots and that if they give way the H, then Maori will probably want the whole country next” insert link. Maori, in the eyes of many, are a threat to local and national legislation and government. Pakeha are positioning themselves to conceive that if Maori get this they’ll get everything. But as Jackson points out, it will only lead to BETTER Maori and Pakeha relations, just as the initiatives of the 80s, 90s and 2000 have proven.
Pehea ou whakaaro???
Here is the full story behind the debate
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/national/2876324/Red-letter-day-for-W-font-color-cc0000-h-font-color-anganui